New Delhi, May 26, 2020: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in a plea regarding the levy of interest on loan amounts during the stipulated moratorium period, which has now been extended upto August 31, 2020.

The Supreme Court Bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan, SK Kaul and MR Shah granted one week's time to the Centre and RBI to respond to the plea of a borrower who is aggrieved by RBI's March 27 Notification in as much as it allows interest on loan to be charged during the moratorium period.

On March 27, the RBI had ordered a 3-month moratorium on the payment of all kind of instalments, be it EMIs or credit cards or outstanding term loans, for the period between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020.

This moratorium was recently extended to August 31, 2020.

The petitioner moved the Apex Court contending that the purpose of imposition of moratorium during lockdown was to alleviate the problems faced by common people, but the same is defeated on account of subsistence of interest, which he averred to as antithetical to Article 21 of the Constitution.

The plea enunciates the outright "capriciousness" and "arbitrariness" of the RBI notification as it imposes a burden on borrowers like the Petitioner, thereby violating principles of natural justice, upon which the law stands.

Earlier, on May 8, when the matter previously came up for hearing, Supreme Court had allowed Solicitor General Tushar Mehta time to seek instructions from RBI and the Centre on the issue.

Appearing for the petitioner, Senior Advocate Rajiv Dutta apprised the Court that the moratorium, which was to last for 3 months, has now been extended to 6 months. Seeking relief for now, Dutta urged that the final accounting regarding the amount of interest to be paid by him be done after the matter is decided in Court. "When your Lordships decide this matter, the accounting could be done. Today please give me some relief. Do not penalise me today. Please do not add my interest and start charging compound interest, which essentially amounts to penalising me ", pleaded the petitioner.

News Courtesy:PIB | Hindu| DC | LE | LI | LO | IE | LL | PTI |ht | ET | UNI | DNA | FP | Jurist |IndToday|

Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced supplied by the concerned either as press release, press statement or via other source of information, websearch engines and internet and do not reflect views of Lawtime and hence Lawtime is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, India info Comm Network's website Lawtime.in is not responsible for any of the copy right violation or for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this news article

Comments

Name*:
Phone number:
Email address*:
Comments and questions*:
Enter web form code*: reload image * - required fields.